Elsevier

Theriogenology

Volume 81, Issue 2, 15 January 2014, Pages 243-249
Theriogenology

Research article
Effect of culture medium type on canine adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells and developmental competence of interspecies cloned embryos

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.09.018Get rights and content

Abstract

Canine adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ASCs) are promising as donor cells for somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT). It has been suggested that different cell cultures possess different capacities to support pre-implantation development of SCNT embryos. The aim of this study is to investigate whether two culture medium (RCMEP, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium [DMEM]) affect gene expression of ASCs, subsequent development of interspecies SCNT (iSCNT) and gene expression of cloned embryos. The RCMEP-cultured cells contained significantly greater amounts of SOX2, NANOG, OCT4, DNMT1, and MeCP2 than DMEM-cultured cells (P < 0.05). In iSCNT, the use of DMEM medium for culturing cells resulted in similar development to the blastocyst stage than those derived from RCMEP cultured cells (4.5% and 3.2%, respectively; P > 0.05). The expression of all transcripts except for DNMT1 in cloned blastocysts from RCMEP cultured cells followed those of cloned blastocysts derived from DMEM cultured cells. The alteration of gene expression in ASCs by culture medium was not manifested in the iSCNT embryos derived from these cells. Although the culture medium can induce changes of gene expression by ASCs, such alterations in donor cells did not affect the developmental competence or gene expression patterns of iSCNT embryos.

Introduction

In efforts to improve the efficiency of somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) in mammals, many studies focused on donor cells have been performed. It is critically important for development of reconstructed embryos that the cell cycle states of the donor cell and the enucleated recipient oocyte are coordinated. In SCNT studies with many species, using donor cells that were synchronized into a quiescent (G0/G1) stage improved cloned blastocyst formation and cloned offspring birth rates [1], [2], [3], [4]. Methods such as serum starvation during cell culture or roscovitine are often used to achieve cell-cycle synchronization [5], [6].

The type of nuclear donor cell, characterized by its tissue origin and extent of differentiation, is among the key factors affecting the efficiency of SCNT, but cell selection and treatment are controversial areas. In mice, greater numbers of offspring were produced through nuclear transfer with embryonic stem cells compared with somatic cells [7]. However, in vitro development of mouse embryos cloned using hematopoietic stem cells was inefficient and production of cloned pups was no better than with clones made using other somatic cells such as cumulus, Sertoli, and fibroblast cells [8]. In canine SCNT, cloned offspring have been derived using donor cells of several types, which affected the efficacy of cloning [5], [9], [10], [11].

The final factor affecting the SCNT procedure is the complete reprogramming potential of donor cells. Successful reprogramming of donor cells can be influenced by in vitro culture conditions, including passage number, serum concentration, cell density, and chemical treatment [12], [13], [14], [15]. Recent studies in mice have shown that treatment of donor cells with chemicals such as trichostatin A changed epigenetic methylation patterns and improved the quality of cloned blastocysts through induced hyperacetylation in mice [16], [17], cattle [18], and pigs [19] SCNT.

To perform this experiment, it is necessary to prepare matured oocyte and donor cell derived from dogs. However, it is difficult to obtain many high-quality recipient canine oocytes because of a limited number of in vivo mature oocytes [20] and still low in vitro maturation (IVM) rate [21], [22], [23]. Therefore, interspecies SCNT (iSCNT) is utilized to analyze gene expression patterns of donor cells and cloned embryos derived from donor cells with different culture medium. The iSCNT technique has been used widely for evaluating the developmental competence of donor cells, investigating development mechanism of the reconstructed embryos, and preserving the endangered animals [24], [25].

Thus, the purpose of the present study was to (1) compare gene expression of canine ASCs grown in two culture medium, (2) analyze in vitro development of iSCNT embryos derived from ASCs cultured in two different media, and (3) investigate expression patterns of genes related to stemness, reprogramming, and pre-implantation development in iSCNT embryos.

Section snippets

Donor cell culture and preparations

Canine ASCs were prepared as described previously [11]. In brief, cells were isolated from subcutaneous fat tissue collected from the abdomen of a healthy beagle dog under a protocol approved by Seoul National University. Cryopreserved cells at passage 0 were thawed and cultured in two different medium: RCMEP (ASCs culture medium; Keratinocyte-SFM (Invitrogen)-based medium containing 0.2 mmol/L ascorbic acid, 0.09  mmol/L calcium, 5 ng/mL rat EGF, and 5% fetal bovine serum; RNL Bio Ltd., Seoul,

Characterization of ASCs cultured in each culture medium type by FACS analysis

The cell surface marker of mesenchymal stem cell marker in ASCs was examined by flow cytometry as suggested in Figure 1. The ASCs cultured in RCMEP were positive for CD29, CD44, and CD90, but negative for CD105, CD31, CD34, and CD45. In the same manner, the ASCs cultured in DMEM show identical cell surface marker expression with those cultured in RCMEP.

Changes in expression of reprogramming- and stemness-related genes in ASCs cultured in different culture media

The relative abundance of gene transcripts in ASCs cultured in each medium is shown in Figure 2. Compared with RCMEP-cultured cells,

Discussion

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of culture medium for canine ASCs on SCNT efficiency. Because SCNT requires complete reprogramming of somatic donor cells to the totipotent state, expression patterns of reprogramming related genes in somatic cells may affect cloning efficiency. In addition, culture conditions used for donor cells induce different outcomes in pre-implantation development of SCNT embryos [29], [30]. In mammals, a direct relationship has been observed

Conclusion

We have demonstrated that components of the culture medium can change the expression level of stemness and reprogramming genes in canine ASCs. However, altering gene expression levels in nuclear donor cells by changing the culture medium did not influence subsequent in vitro development of cloned embryos.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by RDA (#PJ0089752013), RNL Bio (#550-20120006), IPET (#311062-042-SB010), Research Institute for Veterinary Science and TS Corporation. The authors thank Dr. Barry D. Bavister for his valuable editing of the manuscript.

References (45)

  • P. Loi et al.

    Interspecies somatic cell nuclear transfer: a salvage tool seeking first aid

    Theriogenology

    (2011)
  • S. Sugimura et al.

    Interspecies somatic cell nucleus transfer with porcine oocytes as recipients: a novel bioassay system for assessing the competence of canine somatic cells to develop into embryos

    Theriogenology

    (2009)
  • P.J. Quesenberry et al.

    Cellular phenotype switching and microvesicles

    Adv Drug Deliv Rev

    (2010)
  • M. Okano et al.

    DNA methyltransferases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b are essential for de novo methylation and mammalian development

    Cell

    (1999)
  • K.J. Eilertsen et al.

    Targeting cellular memory to reprogram the epigenome, restore potential, and improve somatic cell nuclear transfer

    Anim Reprod Sci

    (2007)
  • D. Bourc'his et al.

    Delayed and incomplete reprogramming of chromosome methylation patterns in bovine cloned embryos

    Curr Biol

    (2001)
  • S. Li et al.

    Rabbits generated from fibroblasts through nuclear transfer

    Reproduction

    (2006)
  • R. Tomii et al.

    Production of cloned pigs by nuclear transfer of preadipocytes following cell cycle synchronization by differentiation induction

    J Reprod Dev

    (2009)
  • M.C. Gomez et al.

    Nuclear transfer of synchronized African wild cat somatic cells into enucleated domestic cat oocytes

    Biol Reprod

    (2003)
  • O.J. Koo et al.

    Cell cycle synchronization of canine ear fibroblasts for somatic cell nuclear transfer

    Zygote

    (2009)
  • W.M. Rideout et al.

    Generation of mice from wild-type and targeted ES cells by nuclear cloning

    Nat Genet

    (2000)
  • G. Jang et al.

    Conservation of the Sapsaree (Canis familiaris), a Korean Natural Monument, using somatic cell nuclear transfer

    J Vet Med Sci

    (2009)
  • Cited by (9)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Both authors contributed equally.

    View full text