Theriogenology
Volume 74, Issue 3 , Pages 424-435, August 2010

Effect of semen preparation on casa motility results in cryopreserved bull spermatozoa

  • Alberto Contri

      Affiliations

    • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Teramo, Viale Crispi 212, 64100 Teramo, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel./fax: +39 0861 266975
  • ,
  • Claudio Valorz

      Affiliations

    • Provincial Breeders Federation of Trento, Via delle Bettine 40, 38100 Trento, Italy
  • ,
  • Massimo Faustini

      Affiliations

    • Department of Veterinary Sciences and Technologies for Food Safety, University of Milan, Via Celoria 10, 20133 Milan, Italy
  • ,
  • Laura Wegher

      Affiliations

    • Provincial Breeders Federation of Trento, Via delle Bettine 40, 38100 Trento, Italy
  • ,
  • Augusto Carluccio

      Affiliations

    • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Teramo, Viale Crispi 212, 64100 Teramo, Italy

Received 11 May 2009; received in revised form 25 February 2010; accepted 28 February 2010. published online 10 May 2010.

Abstract 

Computer-assisted sperm analyzers (CASA) have become the standard tool for evaluating sperm motility and kinetic patterns because they provide objective data for thousands of sperm tracks. However, these devices are not ready-to-use and standardization of analytical practices is a fundamental requirement. In this study, we evaluated the effects of some settings, such as frame rate and frames per field, chamber and time of analysis, and samples preparations, including thawing temperature, sperm sample concentration, and media used for dilution, on the kinetic results of bovine frozen-thawed semen using a CASA. In Experiment 1, the frame rate (30–60 frame/s) significantly affected motility parameters, whereas the number of frames per field (30 or 45) did not seem to affect sperm kinetics. In Experiment 2, the thawing protocol affects sperm motility and kinetic parameters. Sperm sample concentration significantly limited the opportunity to perform the analysis and the kinetic results. A concentration of 100 and 50 × 106 sperm/mL limited the device's ability to perform the analysis or gave wrong results, whereas 5, 10, 20, and 30 × 106 sperm/mL concentrations allowed the analysis to be performed, but with different results (Experiment 3). The medium used for the dilution of the sample, which is fundamental for a correct sperm head detection, affects sperm motility results (Experiment 4). In this study, Makler and Leja chambers were used to perform the semen analysis with CASA devices. The chamber used significantly affected motility results (Experiment 5). The time between chamber loading and analysis affected sperm velocities, regardless of chamber used. Based on results recorded in this study, we propose that the CASA evaluation of motility of bovine frozen-thawed semen using Hamilton-Thorne IVOS 12.3 should be performed using a frame rate of 60 frame/s and 30 frames per field. Semen should be diluted at least at 20 × 106 sperm/mL using PBS. Furthermore, it is necessary to consider the type of chamber used and perform the analysis within 1 or 2 min, regardless of the chamber used.

Keywords: Bull, Frozen-thawed semen, Motility, CASA

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0093-691X(10)00140-8

doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.02.025

Theriogenology
Volume 74, Issue 3 , Pages 424-435, August 2010