Theriogenology
Volume 74, Issue 1 , Pages 31-39, 1 July 2010

In vitro evaluation of fresh sperm quality in tomcats: A comparison of two collection techniques

  • M. Filliers

      Affiliations

    • Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +32 9 264 75 51; fax: +32 9 264 77 97.
  • ,
  • T. Rijsselaere

      Affiliations

    • Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium
  • ,
  • P. Bossaert

      Affiliations

    • Veterinary Clinical Department, Obstetric-Gynaecological Section, University of Bologna, Ozzano Emilia (BO), Italy
  • ,
  • D. Zambelli

      Affiliations

    • Veterinary Clinical Department, Obstetric-Gynaecological Section, University of Bologna, Ozzano Emilia (BO), Italy
  • ,
  • P. Anastasi

      Affiliations

    • Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy
  • ,
  • M. Hoogewijs

      Affiliations

    • Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium
  • ,
  • A. Van Soom

      Affiliations

    • Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium

Received 7 August 2009; received in revised form 7 December 2009; accepted 13 December 2009. published online 11 March 2010.

Abstract 

The collection of semen from tomcats by urethral catheterization (CT) after medetomidine administration offers a novel and easy approach to obtain good quality sperm for in vitro fertilization. This study was designed to compare the sperm quality parameters and in vitro fertilizing capacity of CT spermatozoa with those of spermatozoa retrieved after epididymal slicing (EP). Semen was collected in seventeen adult cats by urethral catheterization, after which the cat was orchiectomized. Motility, morphology, plasma membrane integrity, acrosomal status, and in vitro fertilizing capacity of both fresh CT and EP samples were evaluated. The results showed that both total and progressive motility, as well as the percentage of normal spermatozoa, were higher for EP sperm than for CT sperm (P<0.01). Epididymal sperm had a lower percentage of spermatozoa with an intact acrosome (P<0.01), while CT sperm contained more spermatozoa with tail abnormalities (P<0.01). Other morphological parameters, as well as plasma membrane integrity, did not differ (P>0.05) between CT and EP sperm. Nevertheless, no difference (P>0.05) in in vitro fertilizing capacity between spermatozoa collected by means of the two different methods was found. In conclusion, semen collection by means of urethral catheterization after medetomidine administration yields fertilization results similar to epididymal slicing, despite the fact that several sperm variables were different. Since this novel catheterization technique is repeatable, is easy to perform and facilitates semen preparation protocols, it may be preferable for routine IVF experiments with fresh spermatozoa.

Keywords: Sperm, Domestic cat, Epididymal, Urethral catheterization, In vitro fertilization

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0093-691X(10)00053-1

doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.12.016

Theriogenology
Volume 74, Issue 1 , Pages 31-39, 1 July 2010