Theriogenology
Volume 73, Issue 8 , Pages 1127-1138, May 2010

Rates of luteolysis and pregnancy in dairy cows after treatment with cloprostenol or dinoprost

  • J.S. Stevenson

      Affiliations

    • Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 785 532 1243; fax: +1 785 532 7059.
  • ,
  • A.P. Phatak

      Affiliations

    • Technical Services Veterinarian, Alta Genetics, Hughson, California USA

Received 2 December 2009; received in revised form 6 January 2010; accepted 7 January 2010. published online 25 January 2010.

Abstract 

Our objective was to determine whether rates of luteolysis or pregnancy differed in lactating dairy cows of known progesterone status and either known or unknown luteal status after either cloprostenol or dinoprost was injected as part of a timed-insemination program. In Experiment 1, 2358 lactating dairy cows in six herds were given two injections of PGF 14 d apart (Presynch), with the second injection given 12 to 14 d before the onset of a timed AI protocol (Ovsynch). Cows (n=1094) were inseminated when detected in estrus after the Presynch PGF injections. Cows not inseminated (n=1264) were enrolled in the Ovsynch protocol and assigned randomly to be treated with either cloprostenol or dinoprost as part of the timed-AI protocol. In cows having pretreatment concentrations of progesterone ≥ 1ng/mL and potentially having a functional corpus luteum (CL) responsive to cloprostenol (n=558) or dinoprost (n=519), dinoprost increased (P<0.05) luteal regression from 86.6 to 91.3%. Despite a significant increase in luteolysis, pregnancies per AI did not differ between luteolytic agents (dinoprost=37.8% and cloprostenol=36.7%). Fertility was improved in cows of both treatments having reduced concentrations of progesterone at 72h and in cows showing signs of estrus. In Experiment 2, an ovulation-resynchronization program was initiated with GnRH or saline in 427 previously inseminated lactating dairy cows of unknown pregnancy status in one herd. Seven days later, pregnancy was diagnosed and nonpregnant cows were blocked by number of CL and assigned randomly to be treated with cloprostenol or dinoprost. Compared with cloprostenol, dinoprost increased (P<0.05) luteal regression from 69.1 to 78.5%, regardless of the number of CL present or the total luteal volume per cow. Pregnancies per AI did not differ between dinoprost (32.8%) and cloprostenol (31.3%). Although dinoprost was more effective than cloprostenol at inducing luteolysis in lactating dairy cows exposed to an Ovsynch or ovulation-resynchronization protocol, resulting fertility did not differ between products.

Keywords: Corpus luteum, Dairy cattle, Luteolysis, Pregnancy per AI, Prostaglandin F

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0093-691X(10)00034-8

doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.01.014

Theriogenology
Volume 73, Issue 8 , Pages 1127-1138, May 2010