Theriogenology
Volume 73, Issue 6 , Pages 828-837, 1 April 2010

Modeling the interaction of gametes and embryos with the maternal genital tract: From in vivo to in silico

  • A. Van Soom

      Affiliations

    • Reproductive Biology Unit, Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +32 9 264 75 50; fax: +32 9 264 77 97.
  • ,
  • L. Vandaele

      Affiliations

    • Reproductive Biology Unit, Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium
  • ,
  • L.J. Peelman

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nutrition, Genetics and Ethology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium
  • ,
  • K. Goossens

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nutrition, Genetics and Ethology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium
  • ,
  • A. Fazeli

      Affiliations

    • Academic Unit of Reproductive and Developmental Medicine, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom

Received 24 November 2009; accepted 11 December 2009. published online 25 January 2010.

Abstract 

Understanding the complex interaction between gametes or embryos and the maternal genital tract requires the use of experimental models. The selection of the right model is an important task to undertake, and despite many new developments in this area, an ideal model system has not yet been developed. In this review article, we focus on how the most appropriate model species and model system can be selected, each with its particular advantages and disadvantages. Selection criteria need to be based on the evaluation of the aim of the experiment, the tools that are available to the scientist, and the ethics that are involved in working with particular animal species and model systems. Society and politics direct scientists to “Refine, Reduce, and Replace” the use of experimental animals, which means that the use of in vivo models is increasingly being discouraged. An in vivo model allows experimentation in the full biological environment of a living organism. In contrast with in vivo models, in vitro models are less complex and are abstracts of in vivo systems, leading often to results that are different from the in vivo situation. If an investigator could understand all the components of a complex biological system and re-create them as individual smaller models in a computer, he or she could create in silico models that would completely represent the complexity of in vivo models. We predict that in the future, in silico modeling will be the natural departure from in vivo, in situ, and in vitro modeling approaches. In addition to numerous advantages that this modeling approach can bring to studying maternal interaction with gametes and embryo, it is perhaps the only true alternative method to animal experimentation.

Keywords: Animal replacement, In silico, In vitro, In vivo, Model systems

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0093-691X(10)00021-X

doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.01.001

Theriogenology
Volume 73, Issue 6 , Pages 828-837, 1 April 2010