Advertisement
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 73, Issue 2, Pages 225-231 (15 January 2010)


View previous. 12 of 17 View next.

Immediate and delayed (after cooling) effects of centrifugation on equine sperm

J.A. LenaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, J.A. Jenkinsb, B.E. Eiltsa, D.L. Paccamontia, S.K. Lylea, G. Hosgooda

Received 16 March 2009; received in revised form 2 September 2009; accepted 9 September 2009. published online 16 November 2009.

Abstract 

The objectives of this study were to determine the effects of centrifugation on equine sperm total and progressive motility, viability, and acrosomal integrity. We hypothesized that although high centrifugation forces would be detrimental to equine Equus caballus sperm, recovery rates would increase. Ejaculates from six stallions were collected, extended to a concentration of 25×106 cells/mL, and subjected for 10min to (1) no centrifugation (NC) or (2) centrifugation at 400×g, (3) 900×g, or (4) 4500×g. Before and after centrifugation (Day 0), and after 24h of cooling (Day 1), sperm motility was assessed by computer-assisted semen analysis, and samples were stained with SYBR-14/propidium iodide (PI) for viability and with PI/fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)–Peanut aglutinin (PNA) (Arachis hypogaea) for acrosomal integrity. The effect of treatment and day on motility, viability, and acrosomal integrity was determined using a mixed linear model. Compared with the other treatments, centrifugation at 4500×g reduced all end points measured (P<0.05). Both 400×g and 900×g yielded lower recovery rates than that of 4500×g (NC=100.0±0.0%; 400×g=54.4±8.6%; 900×g=75.0±7.1%; 4500×g=97.9±2.8%; P<0.05). Centrifugation at 400×g or 900×g did not damage equine sperm. Based on these findings, further studies of centrifugal forces between 900×g and 4500×g are warranted to determine the optimal force that maximizes recovery rate, minimizes sperm damage, and does not affect fertility.

a Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA

b U.S. Geological Survey, National Wetlands Research Center, Lafayette, Louisiana, USA

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +225 578 9500; fax: +225 578 9559.

PII: S0093-691X(09)00404-X

doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.09.003


View previous. 12 of 17 View next.

Advertisement