Theriogenology
Volume 72, Issue 9 , Pages 1237-1250, December 2009

Effects of low versus physiologic plasma progesterone concentrations on ovarian follicular development and fertility in beef cattle

  • L.F.M. Pfeifer

      Affiliations

    • University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
    • Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Department of Animal Science, Pelotas, RS, Brazil
  • ,
  • R.J. Mapletoft

      Affiliations

    • University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
  • ,
  • J.P. Kastelic

      Affiliations

    • Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Research Centre, Lethbridge, AB, Canada
  • ,
  • J.A. Small

      Affiliations

    • Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Research Centre, Brandon, MB, Canada
  • ,
  • G.P. Adams

      Affiliations

    • University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
  • ,
  • N.J. Dionello

      Affiliations

    • Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Department of Animal Science, Pelotas, RS, Brazil
  • ,
  • J. Singh

      Affiliations

    • University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 306 966 7410; fax: +1 306 966 7405.

Received 9 December 2008; received in revised form 15 July 2009; accepted 29 July 2009. published online 25 September 2009.

Abstract 

The objective of this study was to determine the effects of low versus physiologic plasma progesterone concentrations during the ovulatory wave on fertility in cattle. Suckled beef cows (Bos taurus; n=129) and pubertal heifers (Bos taurus; n=150) at random stages of the estrous cycle were given a luteolytic dose of prostaglandin F (500μg cloprostenol; PGF) twice, 11 d apart. Ten days after the second PGF treatment, cattle were given estradiol benzoate im (1.5 and 1.0mg for cows and heifers, respectively) and a progesterone-releasing intravaginal device (Cue-Mate) with a single pod containing 0.78g progesterone (Day 0). Cattle in the low-progesterone group (n = 148) received a luteolytic dose of PGF on Day 0, whereas those in the high-progesterone (i.e., physiologic plasma concentrations) group (n=131) were allowed to retain their corpora lutea. On Day 8, the Cue-Mate was removed, and PGF was given to both groups. Fifty-four hours to 56h later, cattle received 12.5mg of porcine LH (pLH) im and were concurrently artificially inseminated. The dominant follicle in the low-progesterone group was larger (P<0.001) than that in the high-progesterone group on the day of insemination (14.9±0.3mm vs. 12.7±0.3mm, mean±SEM). At 7 d after ovulation, the low-progesterone group had a larger corpus luteum (24.5±0.54mm vs. 21.9±0.64mm, P<0.01) and higher plasma progesterone concentration (4.0±0.3 vs. 3.1±0.2, P<0.01) than that of the high-progesterone group. However, pregnancy rates did not differ (79 of 148, 53.4%, and 70 of 131, 53.4%) for low- and high-progesterone groups, respectively). In summary, low circulating progesterone concentrations during the growing phase of the ovulatory follicle resulted in a larger dominant follicle and a larger CL that produced more progesterone, with no significant effect on pregnancy rate.

Keywords: Cattle, Corpus luteum, Ovarian follicular development, Progesterone, Synchronization of ovulation

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0093-691X(09)00364-1

doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.07.019

Theriogenology
Volume 72, Issue 9 , Pages 1237-1250, December 2009