Elsevier

Theriogenology

Volume 68, Issue 3, August 2007, Pages 329-337
Theriogenology

The value of canine semen evaluation for practitioners

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.04.017Get rights and content

Abstract

Compared to human medicine, little is known in canine medicine regarding specific findings on semen evaluation and their correlation with fertility. Suggestions to optimize quality of semen evaluation in veterinary practice include creating standardized protocols for evaluation of all semen parameters and updating those protocols as needed; creating some form of quality control for the clinic laboratory; educating owners about our inability to predict with 100% accuracy whether dogs with poor semen quality never could impregnate a bitch or whether dogs with excellent semen quality always could impregnate a bitch; and generating protocols for further diagnostic work-up for those dogs with abnormal semen quality.

Section snippets

What do the numbers mean?

Veterinary practitioners may perform semen analysis as part of a complete breeding soundness examination, to evaluate suitability of semen for AI, preservation by chilling or freezing, or to investigate subfertility or infertility. Unfortunately, there is a paucity of data associating the parameters measured during semen evaluation with the issues veterinarians really need to evaluate, i.e. testicular function, fertilizing capability of spermatozoa, and likelihood that pups will develop

Collection and evaluation of semen

Collection of canine semen by manual ejaculation will not be described. The reader is asked to review pertinent literature regarding appropriate equipment, technique, and environment to enhance collection of semen from dogs. Although it is generally accepted that a dog should not be condemned on the results of one semen evaluation, there are no published guidelines for timing of semen collection relative to sexual activity, as there are in humans. The World Health Organization, to promote

Volume

Dog semen is ejaculated in three fractions. The first (pre-sperm) fraction is small in volume and contains few to no spermatozoa. The second (sperm-rich) fraction comes from the epididymes and testes. The third (prostatic) fraction consists solely of prostatic fluid and also contains few to no spermatozoa. The volumes of the first and third fractions, especially the latter, are variable, and the volume of the third fraction is controlled by the person collecting the sample, as they choose to

Color

Color evaluation is subjective but may guide the clinician toward other tests to be performed. A clear sample contains no spermatozoa. Cloudy or milky samples probably contain spermatozoa but always should be checked microscopically; occasionally, a dog with azoospermia will shed excessive numbers of fat droplets into the sample, giving the appearance of normal semen. Yellow semen is indicative of urine contamination and is also seen in humans with icterus or after ingestion of certain

pH

Controversy exists regarding the value of measurement of pH in canine semen. Reported values for normal pH in non-fractionated canine semen vary from 6.4 to 6.8 [11], [12], [13]. One author recommended that evaluation of pH be performed immediately after collection using accurate equipment (presumably a pH meter) and strongly discouraged use of a “dipstick” method [14]. In humans, it is recommended that pH be evaluated within an hour of semen collection and that pH paper be used [9]. The author

Motility

For canine semen, motility is better maintained if samples are kept at room temperature than at body temperature [11], [14]. Quick temperature fluctuations should be avoided. Room temperature may play a factor; one report of canine semen evaluation in a tropical region suggested that lack of motility in some samples was due to lack of air conditioning in the room where the sample was collected [12]. Percentage progressively motile spermatozoa from a given dog is not affected by frequency of

Morphology

Percentage morphologically normal spermatozoa (MNS) is not altered in dogs with frequent semen collection [16]. Age may have a role; in humans, percentage MNS declines after 45 years of age [17].

Preparation of the morphology slide and staining technique artifactually alter fertility [27], [28], [29], [30], [31]. One study compared preparation of slides by placing a drop of semen on a glass slide, laying another slide directly on top of it, and pulling the two slides apart, as in a squash prep;

Concentration and total number

Concentration is the parameter measured when performing semen evaluation in dogs but has little value as an indicator of semen quality. Concentration is inversely related to volume collected [40]. Concentration multiplied by volume is the total number of spermatozoa in the ejaculate; total number of spermatozoa is dependent on testicular size [41]. In dogs, normal total number of spermatozoa is greater than 300 million.

Total number of spermatozoa decreases with frequent semen collection,

Miscellaneous tests

None of the techniques described below are useful for semen evaluation by the average practitioner, with the possible exception of assessment for other cell types and the hypo-osmotic swelling test. Some, such as use of centrifugation gradients, can be employed to enhance quality of semen before chilling or freezing.

Assessment for other cell types

Other cell types that may be present in semen include prostatic or urethral epithelial cells, immature germ cells, red blood cells, and inflammatory cells. Quantification of epithelial cells may be accomplished by determining number of the cells of interest (N) per 100 spermatozoa. Concentration of the cell of interest in millions/mL equals the number of the cells of interest times concentration of spermatozoa in that sample divided by 100 [9].

As many as 2000 white blood cells/μL may be present

Live-dead staining

Live-dead staining relies on variable appearance of spermatozoa that take up stain. It is assumed that spermatozoa that take up stain have damaged plasma membranes and are therefore designated as non-functional, or dead. Eosin-nigrosin stains are those most commonly described. Problems with this test include inability to consistently classify spermatozoa with partial staining and interference with staining if glycerol or fat globules are present in the seminal fluid [49]. The author is unaware

Hypo-osmotic swelling (HOS) test

The hypo-osmotic swelling test involves submersion of spermatozoa into a hypo-osmotic medium. Those spermatozoa that have intact plasma membranes will swell as fluid moves into the sperm cell; this will cause swelling and coiling of the tail [3]. Hypo-osmolar solutions described include sodium citrate (7.35 g) and fructose (13.51 g) in 1000 mL of distilled water, and 100 mM sucrose solution [50], [51]. Incubation time before examination varies. In one study, maximum percentage swollen spermatozoa

Measurement of components of seminal fluid

The components of seminal fluid reported as measured as a component of semen evaluation in dogs include glandular products, proteins, and electrolytes [1], [55], [56], [57], [58], [59]. Components may break down at variable rates after semen collection due to metabolism by spermatozoa and enzyme degradation, and may vary with interval from previous ejaculation, degree of sexual excitement, and health status of accessory sex glands [1].

Heparin-binding proteins have been identified in semen of

Filters, centrifugation gradients, fluorescent staining, and DNA analysis

Various filters have been described for use in evaluation and improvement of canine semen quality [60], [61], [62]. Filters may be used to assess for normal function of spermatozoa by evaluating motility via determination of extent to which spermatozoa can penetrate the filter, or by binding abnormal spermatozoa. While percentage MNS may be much better in semen after filtration, total number of spermatozoa present in the filtrate may be much lower than that in the original sample. In one study

Quality control

Standardization and quality control within laboratories enhances accuracy of analysis. Standardization among laboratories better allows researchers and practitioners to compare laboratory practices and to determine if evidence in the veterinary literature from different laboratories is comparable. Commercial veterinary laboratories work hard to ensure continuing quality control. Individual practices rarely address this issue.

Types of error that may occur include random error, which are chance

Interpretation of findings

Values determined in semen analysis by any means, computer-aided or more subjective, are meaningless unless taken in context. Factors that must be considered include the signalment of the animal; inbred status of the animal; time since semen was last collected; and perhaps season of the year. With this background knowledge, conclusions may be drawn regarding the likelihood of a dog being able to impregnate females.

Age was associated with fertility in humans; semen quality declined after 45

References (80)

  • N. Aziz et al.

    The sperm deformity index: a reliable predictor of the outcome of oocyte fertilization in vitro

    Fertil Steril

    (1996)
  • T. Rijsselaere et al.

    Automated sperm morphometry and morphology analysis of canine semen by the Hamilton-Thorne analyzer

    Theriogenology

    (2004)
  • C. Kuster

    Sperm concentration determination between hemacytometer and CASA systems: why they can be different

    Theriogenology

    (2005)
  • A. Makler et al.

    A new method for rapid determination of sperm concentration in bull and ram semen

    Theriogenology

    (1984)
  • T. Rijsselaere et al.

    New techniques for the assessment of canine semen quality: a review

    Theriogenology

    (2005)
  • J.E. Rodriguez-Gil et al.

    Effects of hypoosmotic incubation on acrosome and tail structure on canine spermatozoa

    Theriogenology

    (1994)
  • F.F. De Souza et al.

    Vasectomy effect on canine seminal plasma biochemical components and their correlation with seminal parameters

    Theriogenology

    (2006)
  • F.F. De Souza et al.

    Heparin-binding proteins of canine seminal plasma

    Theriogenology

    (2006)
  • T. Mogas et al.

    Effect of column filtration upon the quality parameters of fresh dog semen

    Theriogenology

    (1998)
  • M. Hishinuma et al.

    Separation of canine epididymal spermatozoa by Percoll gradient centrifugation

    Theriogenology

    (2004)
  • V. Garcia-Macias et al.

    Assessment of chromatin status (SCSA TM) in epididymal and ejaculated sperm in Iberian red deer, ram and domestic dog

    Theriogenology

    (2006)
  • D.E. Wildt et al.

    Influence of inbreeding on reproductive performance, ejaculate quality and testicular volume in the dog

    Theriogenology

    (1982)
  • B.E. Eilts et al.

    Artificial insemination in the dog

  • R.P. Amann

    A critical review of methods for evaluation of spermatogenesis from seminal characteristics

    J Androl

    (1981)
  • G.C.W. England et al.

    Semen characteristics and fertility in dogs

    Vet Rec

    (1989)
  • J.P. Verstegen et al.

    Oestrus cycle stage dependent effects of male and female blood plasma and vaginal fluid on dog semen motility parameters

    Theriogenology

    (2005)
  • D.S. Irvine

    Tests of sperm function and male infertility

    Res Reprod

    (1986)
  • H. Rui et al.

    Time- and temperature-related alterations in seminal plasma constituents after ejaculation

    Int J Androl

    (1986)
  • J. Verstegen et al.

    Evaluation of the “Minitube SpermVision Computer-Based Automated System” for dog semen analysis

    Theriogenology

    (2006)
  • World Health Organization (WHO)

    WHO laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interaction

    (1999)
  • F.J. Leary

    Clinical significance of hematospermia

    Mayo Clin Proc

    (1974)
  • D.J. Bartlett

    Studies on dog semen. I. Morphological characteristics

    J Reprod Fertil

    (1962)
  • S.N. Chatterjee et al.

    Semen characteristics of normal and vasectomized dogs

    Indian J Exp Biol

    (1976)
  • C.B. Daiwadnya et al.

    Studies on evaluation of dog semen

    Livest Advisor

    (1995)
  • J.H. Boucher et al.

    The evaluation of semen quality in the dog and the effects of frequency of ejaculation upon semen quality, libido, and depletion of sperm reserves

    Cornell Vet

    (1958)
  • F.F. Pasqualotto et al.

    Sperm concentration and normal sperm morphology decrease and follicle-stimulating hormone level increases with age

    BJU Int

    (2005)
  • A. Agarwal et al.

    New semen quality scores developed by principal component analysis of semen characteristics

    J Androl

    (2003)
  • A.R. Gunzel-Apel et al.

    Computer-assisted analysis of motility, velocity and linearity of dog spermatozoa

    J Reprod Fertil

    (1993)
  • I. Nunez-Martinez et al.

    A three-step statistical procedure to identify sperm kinematic subpopulations in canine ejaculates: changes after cryopreservation

    Reprod Domest Anim

    (2006)
  • T. Rijsselaere et al.

    Use of the sperm quality analyzer (SQA) for the assessment of dog sperm quality

    Reprod Domest Anim

    (2002)
  • Cited by (52)

    • Diagnostic tests in canine andrology - What do they really tell us about fertility?

      2023, Theriogenology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Proper examination techniques and interpretation of the findings are in turn essential skills for small animal practitioners who work with breeders [10]. This is especially true in the context of semen transfer, preservation by chilling or freezing, or investigation in cases of suspected subfertility or infertility [11,12]. The result of a breeding soundness evaluation should give reliable insights into the breeding potential of a dog.

    • The Effect of N-N-Dimethylformamide on the Membrane Characteristics of Canine Spermatozoa After Cryopreservation, and its Relationship With Post-Thaw Motility

      2020, Topics in Companion Animal Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      The dogs were subjected to physical and breeding soundness exams at the Section of Theriogenology and Herd Health, School of Veterinary Medicine, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Only ejaculates from dogs with total motility > 70%, normal sperm morphology > 50%, and total sperm number > 300 × 106 sperm were used for freezing procedures.20 The dogs selected for the trial were healthy at the time of examination and semen collection and showed good libido.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text