Elsevier

Theriogenology

Volume 65, Issue 1, 7 January 2006, Pages 137-152
Theriogenology

Effect of culture environment on gene expression and developmental characteristics in IVF-derived embryos

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.09.028Get rights and content

Abstract

It is generally accepted that mammalian preimplantation embryos are sensitive to their environment and that conditions of culture can affect future growth and developmental potential both pre- and postnatally. Evidence suggests that while culture conditions during bovine in vitro embryo production can impact somewhat on the developmental potential of the early embryo, the intrinsic quality of the oocyte is the key factor determining the proportion of oocytes developing to the blastocyst stage. In addition, evidence suggests that the period of post fertilization embryo culture is the most critical period affecting blastocyst quality assessed in terms of cryotolerance, gene expression pattern and ability to establish a pregnancy. This paper reviews the current literature, with emphasis on the bovine model, demonstrating evidence for an effect of post fertilization culture environment on embryo gene expression and quality.

Introduction

It is well recognised that bovine embryos derived in vivo, typically following superovulation, artificial insemination and non-surgical recovery, are of higher quality than those derived from in vitro maturation (IVM) fertilization (IVF) and culture (IVC). The superiority of in vivo derived embryos is reflected in the most recent published data from commercial cattle embryo transfer practice; in excess of half a million bovine embryos were transferred in 2003 [1], of which 82% (478,542) were in vivo derived using superovulation, artificial insemination and embryo recovery, the remaining 18% (106,220) being produced in vitro from oocytes recovered either from the ovaries of slaughtered cattle or using ovum pickup on live animals. More telling is the fact that of the in vivo derived embryos, approximately half (46.4%, 222,019) were transferred frozen compared with only 14% (14,828) of those produced in vitro, reflecting the poorer cryotolerance of such embryos [2].

Typically, in vitro produced embryos have darker cytoplasm and a lower buoyant density [3] as a consequence of their higher lipid content [4], a more fragile zona pellucida [5], reduced expression of intercellular communicative devices [6], differences in metabolism [7], [8] and a higher incidence of chromosome abnormalities [9], [10], [11]. In addition, many differences have been reported at the ultrastructural level [12], [13], [14], [15] which reflect some of the differences noted above. There are also major differences in gene expression patterns which will be discussed below.

The aim of this short review is to highlight the origin of some of the differences in embryos derived in vivo or in vitro and to describe their developmental characteristics. For the most part, the text is restricted to a discussion of development to the blastocyst stage as others will discuss fetal characteristics in more detail [16], [17], [18].

Section snippets

Indicators of embryo quality

Embryo morphology assessment, with all its drawbacks, is at present the most popular method for embryo selection prior to transfer for assisted reproduction in both cattle and humans. The primary criterion for embryo selection after human IVF is the morphological appearance based on a combination of cell number and fragmentation [19]. In the past few years, the possibilities of viable embryo selection at the early cleavage stages have been improved substantially by the introduction of

Role of the post-fertilization culture period—a few days can make a big difference

The in vitro production of cattle embryos is essentially a three-step process involving in vitro oocyte maturation, in vitro fertilization and in vitro culture. In terms of efficiency, in cattle, approximately 90% of immature oocytes, generally recovered from follicles at unknown stages of the oestrous cycle, undergo nuclear maturation in vitro from prophase I to metaphase II (the stage at which they would be ovulated in vivo); about 80% undergo fertilization following insemination and cleave

Conclusions

The early preimplantation period represents a window in development during which the embryo gene expression blueprint may be predisposed to aberrant programming. While embryos can exhibit plasticity in their ability to adapt to what are, in most cases, suboptimal in vitro conditions, their sensitivity to their environment can lead to long-term alterations in the characteristics of foetal and postnatal growth and development. There is now a considerable volume of evidence in the literature,

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the funding agencies which have funded some or all of our original research: Health Research Board and Science Foundation Ireland. In addition, the continued excellent technical assistance of M. Wade and P. Duffy is very much appreciated.

References (93)

  • A. Menicucci et al.

    Non-classic sHLA class I in human oocyte culture medium

    Hum Immunol

    (1999)
  • G. Sher et al.

    Expression of sHLA-G in supernatants of individually cultured 46-h embryos: a potentially valuable indicator of ‘embryo competency’ and IVF outcome

    Reprod Biomed Online

    (2004)
  • S.M. Yie et al.

    Secretion of human leukocyte antigen-G by human embryos is associated with a higher in vitro fertilization pregnancy rate

    Fertil Steril

    (2005)
  • L.N. Eid et al.

    Duration of G2-phase and onset of M-phase during the first cell cycle of the bovine embryo is dependent on bull in vivo fertility [abstract]

    Theriogenology

    (1995)
  • S.K. Walker et al.

    The production of unusually large offspring following embryo manipulation: concepts and challenges

    Theriogenology

    (1996)
  • T.G. McEvoy et al.

    Dietary excesses of urea influence the viability and metabolism of preimplantation sheep embryos and may affect fetal growth among survivors

    Anim Reprod Sci

    (1997)
  • T.G. McEvoy et al.

    Feed and forage toxicants affecting embryo survival and fetal development

    Theriogenology

    (2001)
  • C. Galli et al.

    Practical aspects of IVM/IVF in cattle

    Anim Reprod Sci

    (1996)
  • M. Thibier

    International Embryo Transfer Society: Data Retrieval Committee Annual Report

    Embryo Transfer Newsletter

    (2004)
  • D. Rizos et al.

    Consequences of bovine oocyte maturation, fertilization or early embryo development in vitro versus in vivo: implications for blastocyst yield and blastocyst quality

    Mol Reprod Dev

    (2002)
  • I.M. Abd El Razek et al.

    Differences in lipid composition between in vivo- and in vitro-produced bovine embryos [abstract]

    Theriogenology

    (2000)
  • R. Boni et al.

    Intracellular communication in in vivo- and in vitro-produced bovine embryos

    Biol Reprod

    (1999)
  • N.K. Khurana et al.

    Energy metabolism in preimplantation bovine embryos derived in vitro or in vivo

    Biol Reprod

    (2000)
  • D. Viuff et al.

    A high proportion of bovine blastocysts produced in vitro are mixoploid

    Biol Reprod

    (1999)
  • W. Slimane et al.

    Assessing chromosomal abnormalities by FISH analysis in 2-cell bovine embryos derived from in vitro and in vivo fertilization [abstract]

    Theriogenology

    (2000)
  • P. Lonergan et al.

    Effect of the post-fertilization culture environment on the incidence of chromosome aberrations in bovine blastocysts

    Biol Reprod

    (2004)
  • A.E. Crosier et al.

    Ultrastructural morphometry of bovine compact morulae produced in vivo or in vitro

    Biol Reprod

    (2000)
  • A.E. Crosier et al.

    Ultrastructural morphometry of bovine blastocysts produced in vivo or in vitro

    Biol Reprod

    (2001)
  • T. Fair et al.

    Ultrastructure of bovine blastocysts following cryopreservation: effect of method of embryo production on blastocyst quality

    Mol Reprod Dev

    (2001)
  • D. Rizos et al.

    Developmental, qualitative and ultrastructural differences between ovine and bovine embryos produced in vivo or in vitro

    Mol Reprod Dev

    (2002)
  • C.E. Farin et al.

    Development of fetuses from in vitro-produced and cloned bovine embryos

    J Anim Sci

    (2004)
  • P.W. Farin et al.

    Errors in development of fetuses and placentas from in vitro produced bovine embryos

    Theriogenology

    (2005)
  • E. Van Royen et al.

    Calculating the implantation potential of day 3 embryos in women younger than 38 years of age: a new model

    Hum Reprod

    (2001)
  • L. Scott et al.

    The morphology of human pronuclear embryos is positively related to blastocyst development and implantation

    Hum Reprod

    (2000)
  • C. Wittemer et al.

    Zygote evaluation: an efficient tool for embryo selection

    Hum Reprod

    (2000)
  • P. Lonergan et al.

    Effect of time interval from insemination to first cleavage on the developmental characteristics, sex and pregnancy rates following transfer of bovine preimplantation embryos

    J Reprod Fertil

    (1999)
  • B.D. Bavister et al.

    Fertilization and cleavage of rhesus monkey oocytes in vitro

    Biol Reprod

    (1983)
  • S.H. McKiernan et al.

    Timing of development is a critical parameter for predicting successful embryogenesis

    Hum Reprod

    (1994)
  • C.M. Warner et al.

    Role of the Ped gene and apoptosis genes in control of preimplantation development

    J Assist Reprod Gen

    (1998)
  • R.G. Edwards et al.

    Factors influencing the success of in vitro fertilization for alleviating human infertility

    J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer

    (1984)
  • A. Bos-Mikich et al.

    Early cleavage of human embryos: an effective method for predicting successful IVF/ICSI outcome

    Hum Reprod

    (2001)
  • Y. Shoukir et al.

    Early cleavage of in-vitro fertilized human embryos to the 2-cell stage: a novel indicator of embryo quality and viability

    Hum Reprod

    (1997)
  • J. Fenwick et al.

    Time from insemination to first cleavage predicts developmental competence of human preimplantation embryos in vitro

    Hum Reprod

    (2002)
  • C.M. Warner et al.

    Linkage of the preimplantation-embryo-developent (Ped) gene to the mouse major histocompatibility complex (MHC)

    Biol Reprod

    (1987)
  • T. Fair et al.

    Search for the bovine homolog of the murine ped gene and characterization of its messenger RNA expression during bovine preimplantation development

    Biol Reprod

    (2004)
  • B. Fuzzi et al.

    HLA-G expression in early embryos is a fundamental prerequisite for the obtainment of pregnancy

    Eur J Immunol

    (2002)
  • Cited by (186)

    • Effect of sex on cryotolerance of bovine embryos produced in vitro

      2020, Theriogenology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thus, quality refers to not only the morphological appearance, but also to the speed of development. In addition to the kinetics of development, male and female embryos differ in terms of metabolism, gene expression [19,29–31], epigenetic patterns [32], and stress responses [33,34]. Differences in how female and male embryos deal with various types of stress have been reported elsewhere.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text